Subscribe where ever you listen to Podcasts:
Resources:
Danny Gudorf, a financial planner, discusses the misconceptions surrounding Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) and how they can be managed effectively. He shares a real-life case study of a couple, Dave and Sandy, to illustrate how strategic planning can lead to significant tax savings. Danny explains recent changes in RMD rules and offers practical strategies for retirees to manage their RMDs, emphasizing the importance of proactive planning and avoiding common mistakes that can lead to financial penalties.
RMDs Aren’t the Retirement Disaster You Think—Here’s What Most People Get Wrong
You’ve probably heard the warning before: Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) will wreck your retirement.
They’ll spike your taxes.
Force you to sell investments at the wrong time.
Trigger higher Medicare premiums.
And once they start, there’s no way to control the damage.
That narrative sounds convincing—but it’s incomplete.
Because after working with hundreds of retirees, a different reality shows up:
RMDs aren’t the problem.
Lack of planning is.
Most people approach RMDs with a defensive mindset.
They assume:
- Taxes will automatically skyrocket
- Their income will spiral out of control
- Their options will be limited
But in many real-life cases, something surprising happens:
RMDs often align closely with what retirees were already planning to withdraw.
The friction doesn’t come from the withdrawal itself.
It comes from how that withdrawal interacts with everything else:
- Social Security
- Investment income
- Tax brackets
- Medicare thresholds
That’s where things either go smoothly… or quietly get expensive.
Consider a couple in their late 60s—let’s call them Dave and Sandy.
They came in with a common concern:
“Once RMDs start, are we going to get crushed by taxes?”
Here’s what their financial picture looked like:
- Social Security: $5,300/month ($63,600/year)
- Brokerage account: $600,000
- IRA: $1,000,000
On paper, it looks like a tax problem waiting to happen.
But here’s what actually happened in one planning year:
- $63,600 from Social Security
- $7,200 in qualified dividends
- $100,000 IRA distribution
- $19,200 from investment sales
Total cash flow: ~$100,000
And their federal income tax?
Close to zero.
Most people assume:
More income equals more taxes.
But retirement tax planning doesn’t work that way.
It’s about:
- What type of income you take
- When you take it
- How it shows up on your tax return
In Dave and Sandy’s case, the strategy wasn’t about avoiding income.
It was about controlling how income is recognized.
Over the past few years, several updates have made RMDs far less rigid than they used to be.
Most people haven’t caught up to these changes yet—which creates opportunity.
The starting age has been pushed back:
- 70½ to 72
- Now 73
- And for some, 75
That means more time for tax planning and strategic withdrawals.
Penalties are less severe:
- Previously 50%
- Now 25%, potentially reduced to 10%
Roth 401(k)s now avoid lifetime RMDs starting in 2024.
Qualified Charitable Distributions allow you to:
- Satisfy RMDs
- Reduce taxable income
- Support causes you care about
For 2026, the limit is $111,000.
Let’s simplify the math.
At age 73, if you have $500,000:
- Your RMD is about $18,867
- That’s roughly a 3.77% withdrawal rate
That’s actually lower than the commonly referenced 4% rule.
So the withdrawal itself isn’t extreme.
The real issue is the chain reaction it can create.
RMDs can:
- Increase taxable income
- Make up to 85% of Social Security taxable
- Push you into higher tax brackets
- Trigger Medicare premium increases
That’s where planning becomes critical.
Three strategies can make a meaningful difference:
Strategic reinvestment
You don’t have to spend your RMD. After taxes, you can reinvest the remainder and keep your assets working.
Qualified Charitable Distributions
If you’re already giving, this allows you to reduce taxable income while satisfying RMD requirements.
Roth conversions
By converting during lower-income years, you can reduce future RMDs and create tax-free income later.
Now consider the alternative.
If you retire with $1 million in your IRA at 65 and take no action:
At 6% growth, by age 73:
- Your balance could reach ~$1.5 million
- Your first RMD could be around $60,000
Layer that on top of Social Security and other income, and you may face:
- Higher tax brackets
- Increased taxation of Social Security
- Higher Medicare premiums
Not because of one decision—but because of years without coordination.
RMDs are not a punishment.
They’re simply a tax rule requiring deferred income to eventually be taxed.
The real opportunity lies in controlling:
- When income is recognized
- How it is taxed
- And how it impacts your broader financial picture
If there’s one step to take now, it’s this:
Review how your future RMDs will interact with your total income—not just your IRA.
Because the biggest mistakes in retirement planning aren’t obvious.
They’re small decisions that compound quietly over time.
With proper planning:
- Income can be smoothed
- Taxes can be managed
- Flexibility can be preserved
RMDs don’t ruin retirements.
Poor planning does.
And with the right approach, they can become just another manageable part of a well-structured retirement strategy.
Transcript: Prefer to Read — Click to Open
Danny (00:00.11)
What if I told you that RMDs are not the retirement killer that everyone says they are? You’ve probably heard they will explode your tax bracket, force you to sell investments you don’t want to, and create a tax problem in your set. I’ve been a financial planner 15 years and have helped more than 200 clients work through their RMDs. And here’s what I’ve learned. For many people, RMDs line up with what they were going to withdraw anyways.
The real problem is not RMDs itself, it’s what people do or fail to do around them. My name is Danny Gudorf, owner of Gudorf Financial Group, a retirement planning firm that helps people over 50 reduce taxes and invest smarter. Today, I’m showing you why RMDs do not have to ruin your retirement. The four rule changes that have made them more flexible and three strategies that can help you manage them with less stress.
I’ll also walk you through a real planning example of a couple who generated $100,000 of retirement income in one year and paid no federal income tax. All right, let me introduce you to a hypothetical couple, Dave and Sandy. They’re in their late 60s and came to us convinced there was no way to avoid high taxes and retirement. If Social Security was $3,000 a month and Sandy’s was $2,300 a month total.
They had $5,300 a month or $63,600 a year in benefits. They also had a $600,000 brokerage account and a $1 million IRA. Sandy asked me, once those RMDs kick in, are we going to get crushed by taxes? And here’s what we did. We started with Social Security as their income base at $63,600 a year.
We added in $7,200 of qualified dividends from their brokerage account, and we took a strategic $100,000 IRA distribution. Then we sold $19,200 of investments, about half of which was long-term capital gains. That brought their total cash flow to roughly $100,000 for the year through careful coordination, use of the standard deduction.
Danny (02:15.406)
for that tax year and managing how much income showed up as taxable, their federal income tax bill was very low and close to zero. The key was not eliminating income, it was managing how they took that taxable income. To understand why this worked, you need to see what’s changed. In 2019 and then again in 2022, the Secure Act 2.0
was changed. Congress made several updates to RMD rules. The starting age used to be 70 and a half. It moved to 72. It is now 73. And if you were born in 1960 or later, your RMD age will be 75. Every year your money stays in that tax deferred account. It gives it more time to grow before withdrawals are required.
The penalty for missing an RMD also changed. used to be 50 % of the amount that you failed to withdraw. Now the base penalty is 25%. If you correct the mistake within the allowed correction window and follow IRS procedures, the penalty can be dropped down to 10%. That’s still serious, but it’s far less severe than before. Also, Roth 401Ks also got better tax treatment. Starting in 2024, Roth 401K balances
are no longer subject to lifetime RMDs for the original owner. Before that, you often had to roll the money into a Roth IRA to avoid those required withdrawals. Now Roth Ks are generally treated like Roth IRAs for lifetime RMD purposes. qualified charitable distributions or QCDs were also improved. If you’re 70 and a half or older, you can direct your IRA custodian to send money straight to a qualified charity.
That amount counts towards your RMD and is excluded from your taxable income in that year. The annual limit is in debt for inflation and for 2026, it’s $111,000. For clients who are already giving to charity, this can reduce taxable income while still meeting required withdrawals. Now, let’s talk about the math behind RMDs. Suppose you have $500,000 at age 73.
Danny (04:35.854)
IRS uniform lifetime tables uses a factor of 26.5 at that age divide 500,000 by 26.5 and you’ll get about $18,867. That is roughly a 3.77 % withdrawal rate on that balance. Many planners reference a 4 % withdrawal guideline for retirement income. So your first RMD is actually slightly lower than that percentage.
For many retirees, the withdrawal itself is not extreme. The issue is what the withdrawal does to their adjusted gross income. Every dollar from a traditional IRA is taxed as ordinary income. If you add a large RMD to Social Security or other income, it can push you into a higher tax bracket. It can also increase the portion of Social Security that is taxable, which can be up to 85%.
depending upon your provisional income. It can also raise your Medicare premiums through ERMA surcharges. For example, in 2026, if a married couple’s modified adjusted gross income is above 218,000, their Medicare Part B premium jumps from about $202 per month to $284 per month per person. That increase adds up quickly. The real planning challenge is managing
this chain reaction, not just the RMD itself. The first strategy is strategic reinvestment. An RMD does not mean you have to spend the money. It means you must withdraw it from your tax deferred account and pay any tax that’s due. After that, you can reinvest the remaining funds in a brokerage account, savings account, or other vehicle. Your net worth only drops by the taxes that were paid. The rest of your capital keeps working.
The second strategy is the QCD for those who are charitably inclined by sending up to $1,000 in 2026 directly from your IRA. You can satisfy all or part of your RMD without increasing your adjusted gross income. This can help reduce taxes on social security and help avoid Medicare premiums. The third strategy is Roth conversions. This involves moving money from a traditional IRA.
Danny (06:57.07)
to a Roth IRA and paying the taxes in the year of the conversion. Once the conversion on the Roth has happened, growth and future qualified withdrawals are tax free and there’s no lifetime RMDs for the original owner. The ideal time to consider conversions is often during your gap years, the period between when you retire and the start of RMDs. If you retire at 62 and your RMD starts at 70, you have an 11 year window
to do some tax planning. Income during those years may be lower than during your working years. This can allow you to convert more at those lower tax rates. All of this comes back to managing your adjusted gross income. AGI affects how much of your social security is taxable and whether you trigger those IRMA surcharges. By using Roth conversions in lower years and QCDs and RMD years, you can smooth out your income and reduce
Now consider what happens if you do nothing. Suppose you retire at 65 with $1 million in your IRA and you never touch it. If it grows at 6 % annually by age 73, eight years later, you would have about $1.5 million using RMD age of 73 and that factor of 26.5, your first RMD would be roughly $60,000 if the account keeps growing.
your required withdrawals would also grow. Large RMDs layered on top of Social Security and other income can push you into higher tax rates. The bottom line is this, required minimum distributions are not a punishment for saving. They are a tax rule. These rules are more flexible than they used to be. For many retirees, the first RMD percentage is modest. With careful planning, you can manage
how those withdrawals affect your taxes, invest what you do not need, and use charitable distributions to lower taxable income. You can also use Roth conversions early in retirement to shrink future RMDs. Now you know how to handle RMDs without letting them derail your retirement. But even with these strategies, there are still mistakes that can cost you thousands if you are not careful. I retirees make the same errors over and over again.
Danny (09:22.784)
and most are avoidable. Click the video right here, the top 10 most common required minimum distribution mistakes to see what they are and how to avoid them. You’ll learn about the time you mistake that can trigger penalties, the reinvestment misstep that can reduce your long-term growth, and the coordination error that can increase the taxable portion of your social security in retirement. Do not miss mistake number seven. It is the one I see most often.
Back to All Episodes
