The IRA Balance Where RMDs Actually Start Costing You More Taxes | The Limitless Retirement Podcast

Subscribe where ever you listen to Podcasts:

Resources:

In this video, Danny Gudorf works backward from the 22% tax bracket to find the IRA balance where required minimum distributions start costing you more in taxes and fees. He walks through the four lines a big RMD can push you over: the jump from the 12% to the 22% tax bracket, IRMAA, the tax torpedo, and the widow's tax trap. Using 2026 numbers for a married couple turning 73, he shows that balance is about $2.47 million in year one but closer to $1.5 million once you project it forward, then runs the same math for a single filer, where adding $1,000 to the RMD works out to a 42.5% marginal rate.

When Do RMDs Become a Tax Problem? The IRA Balance That Changes Everything

Your IRA balance may be much larger than you think before required withdrawals become a problem. But the real danger could be waiting years down the road.

You have spent years building your retirement savings. Now, the IRS requires you to start withdrawing money from your traditional IRA, whether you need it or not.

That sounds like a tax problem waiting to happen.

But what if having a $2 million IRA doesn't automatically mean you have an RMD problem? What if the real issue isn't how much money you have saved, but when your withdrawals push you into higher taxes?

For some retirees, an IRA approaching $2.5 million may not create an immediate federal income tax bracket problem. For others, an IRA worth less than $1 million could lead to unexpected tax consequences.

The difference comes down to your income, filing status, and what happens to your withdrawals over time.

Understanding these factors could change how you approach retirement tax planning.

What Actually Makes an RMD a Problem?

Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) are mandatory withdrawals from certain retirement accounts, including traditional IRAs, once you reach the applicable starting age.

Many retirees assume that the larger their RMD, the bigger their tax problem.

But that isn't necessarily true.

Imagine you need $90,000 annually from your IRA to cover living expenses, travel, and other retirement goals.

If your required distribution is also $90,000, you aren't being forced to withdraw more than you planned to spend.

You would have withdrawn that money anyway.

The real problem begins when two things happen simultaneously:

  • Your RMD forces you to withdraw more money than you need.

  • That additional income triggers higher taxes or other retirement-related costs.

For example, if you only need $70,000 but must withdraw $100,000, that extra $30,000 could increase your tax liability even though you don't need it for expenses.

This distinction matters because reducing your RMD isn't automatically beneficial.

What matters is whether reducing it improves your overall financial outcome.

The Four Tax Traps That Can Make RMDs Expensive

Before determining whether your IRA is too large, you need to understand the financial thresholds that can turn ordinary withdrawals into costly decisions.

1. Moving Into a Higher Tax Bracket

The federal income tax system uses marginal tax rates.

That means crossing into a higher bracket doesn't cause all your income to be taxed at the new rate.

Only the portion above the threshold faces the higher rate.

One important transition for retirees is the jump from the 12% federal income tax bracket to the 22% bracket.

For every additional $10,000 taxed at 22% instead of 12%, the difference is $1,000 in federal income taxes.

That doesn't mean you should avoid the higher bracket at all costs. But knowing when you cross that threshold helps you evaluate your withdrawal strategy.

2. Higher Medicare Premiums

Medicare uses income-related monthly adjustment amounts, commonly called IRMAA, to determine whether you pay additional premiums for Medicare Part B and Part D.

Unlike marginal income tax brackets, these thresholds can create sudden premium increases.

Crossing an applicable IRMAA threshold by even a small amount can place you in a higher premium tier.

Medicare generally uses income information from two years earlier to determine these adjustments.

That means a large IRA withdrawal today could affect your Medicare costs later.

3. The Social Security Tax Torpedo

Your IRA withdrawals can also affect how much of your Social Security benefits become taxable.

Depending on your combined income, up to 85% of your Social Security benefits may be included in federal taxable income.

In certain income ranges, withdrawing an additional dollar from your IRA can increase taxable income by more than one dollar.

This creates a higher effective marginal tax rate than your ordinary bracket might suggest.

4. The Widow's Tax Trap

This is one of the most overlooked retirement tax risks.

When one spouse passes away, the surviving spouse may retain most of the household's retirement assets.

They may also continue receiving the larger Social Security benefit and some pension income.

However, the survivor generally transitions from married filing jointly to single filing status in subsequent tax years.

That creates a difficult combination:

A relatively modest reduction in household income, but substantially narrower tax brackets and smaller deductions.

The result can be a higher tax burden on retirement withdrawals, even though household income has declined.

How Large Can Your IRA Get Before RMDs Become a Problem?

Let's examine a hypothetical married couple who are both 73.

They receive $65,000 annually in combined Social Security benefits and have no pension or other significant income.

Assume 85% of their Social Security benefits are taxable.

That produces $55,250 in taxable Social Security income.

In this hypothetical situation, the couple could begin RMDs with an IRA approaching $2.5 million without their first required withdrawal alone pushing them into the 22% bracket.

That's considerably more than many people expect.

However, the calculation changes when other income enters the picture.

A pension, rental income, taxable investment earnings, or additional wages can reduce the available room.

In this simplified example, another $10,000 in taxable income could reduce the IRA threshold by approximately $265,000.

And there's another important consideration.

Your first RMD doesn't tell you what your tax situation will look like ten years later.

Why Your First RMD Could Be Misleading

Required minimum distributions are calculated using your account balance and an IRS life expectancy factor.

As you move through retirement, that factor generally declines, meaning a larger percentage of your remaining account balance must be distributed.

At the same time, your investments may continue growing.

If your portfolio earns more than you're required to withdraw, your IRA balance can increase despite taking distributions.

That creates a potential problem.

Your RMDs may grow faster than the tax thresholds you're trying to stay below.

Consider a hypothetical projection using these assumptions:

  • 6% annual investment growth.

  • 2.5% annual inflation.

  • Adjustments to applicable tax thresholds over time.

  • The married couple's income assumptions from the previous example.

A couple starting with $2 million may avoid the 22% bracket in their first RMD year, only to cross it a few years later.

Even a $1.5 million IRA could eventually create additional tax exposure.

This is why evaluating only your first required distribution can produce a false sense of security.

A retirement tax plan needs to account for what happens throughout retirement, not simply the year your RMDs begin.

Why Single Retirees Face a Different Calculation

Now consider a single taxpayer who is 73 and receives $40,000 annually from Social Security.

Using the same general approach and the assumptions in the example, the IRA balance that pushes this individual into the 22% bracket during their first RMD year is approximately $1.174 million.

Compare that with the married couple's nearly $2.5 million threshold.

The single taxpayer's threshold is less than half the married couple's.

And the difference becomes even more significant when we project forward.

Under the example's assumptions, a single retiree beginning with a $1 million IRA could cross into the 22% bracket at 76.

Someone beginning with approximately $780,000 could reach that threshold at 85.

These figures illustrate why married couples should consider evaluating their retirement tax strategy under both joint and potential surviving-spouse filing scenarios.

Your plan might look comfortable while you're filing jointly but become much less tax-efficient after one spouse passes away.

The Hidden 42.5% Tax Rate

One of the most surprising findings in the example involves a single retiree who appears to be in the 22% federal income tax bracket.

You might assume that withdrawing another $1,000 from the IRA would create approximately $220 in additional federal taxes.

But that's not always what happens.

In the transcript's hypothetical calculation, withdrawing another $1,000 causes two additional effects.

First, more Social Security benefits become taxable.

Second, the additional income begins reducing the taxpayer's eligibility for the enhanced senior deduction.

Together, those effects increase taxable income by approximately $1,934.

The additional federal income tax comes to roughly $425.

That's substantially higher than the taxpayer's stated 22% bracket.

Not everyone will experience this combination of tax rules.

But it demonstrates why looking only at published tax brackets can underestimate the true cost of additional IRA withdrawals.

Your actual marginal tax exposure can depend on deductions, Social Security taxation, Medicare thresholds, and other income-related rules.

How to Find Your Own RMD Threshold

The key is to identify the point where your required withdrawals begin creating additional financial consequences.

You can start with five questions.

1. Which Tax Threshold Matters Most?

For some households, the main concern is moving into the next federal income tax bracket.

For others, it's Medicare IRMAA, increased Social Security taxation, or the impact of single filing status.

Your most important threshold depends on your overall financial situation.

2. How Much Income Can You Receive Before Crossing It?

Start with the relevant income threshold and account for applicable deductions.

Remember that tax brackets and Medicare thresholds measure income differently.

For example, IRMAA generally uses modified adjusted gross income, rather than taxable income after the standard deduction.

3. How Much Income Comes From Other Sources?

Consider taxable income from pensions, investments, rental properties, employment, and Social Security.

Those income sources affect how much room remains for additional IRA withdrawals.

Because certain benefits and deductions change with income, some calculations require more than simple subtraction.

4. What IRA Balance Produces That RMD?

For a traditional IRA using the Uniform Lifetime Table, the age-73 factor is 26.5.

If your calculation shows $50,000 of available RMD room, multiplying that amount by 26.5 produces approximately $1.325 million.

That gives you a starting estimate of the IRA balance associated with the selected threshold.

5. What Happens Over the Next Several Years?

Finally, project your retirement accounts, withdrawals, other income, and tax thresholds forward.

Consider what changes if one spouse becomes the surviving taxpayer.

A strategy that looks effective in one year may produce very different results over an entire retirement.

Should You Reduce Your Future RMDs?

Once you understand whether your required distributions will create a problem, you can evaluate potential strategies.

Possible approaches include taking planned IRA withdrawals before RMDs begin, making Roth conversions, or using qualified charitable distributions when eligible.

Each strategy serves a different purpose.

For example, a Roth conversion may reduce future traditional IRA balances, but it can also increase your current taxable income.

That additional income could create higher taxes or Medicare premiums.

Similarly, withdrawing money early solely to reduce a future RMD may not make sense if you pay more taxes today than you would otherwise pay later.

Qualified charitable distributions can be useful for eligible individuals who already intend to give to charity, but they aren't appropriate for every household.

And sometimes the most practical answer is simply to use your RMD for retirement spending.

If you already need the money, the required withdrawal may not create a meaningful problem.

The objective isn't to eliminate RMDs at any cost.

It's to coordinate your withdrawals with the rest of your retirement plan so you can manage your lifetime tax burden.

Your Retirement Tax Plan Needs to Look Beyond Today's IRA Balance

At Gudorf Financial Group, we believe retirement tax planning should consider more than account balances or the next required distribution.

Your income needs, investment strategy, Medicare costs, Social Security benefits, and family circumstances all influence the decisions you make.

A larger IRA doesn't necessarily mean you have a tax problem.

And a smaller IRA doesn't guarantee that you're protected from one.

What matters is understanding how your retirement income interacts with the tax rules over time.

Before making a major withdrawal or conversion decision, consider how that choice affects both your current taxes and your future financial flexibility.

Conclusion: The Right Question Isn't How Big Your IRA Is

Your RMD becomes a concern when it forces you to withdraw more than you need and creates additional tax or Medicare costs.

That's why the size of your IRA alone doesn't tell the whole story.

A $2 million account might fit comfortably within one household's tax plan, while a much smaller account could create complications for someone with different income or filing circumstances.

The most important questions are simple:

Where is your tax threshold? When might you cross it? And will your retirement plan continue working if your filing status changes?

Answering those questions can help you make more informed decisions about your withdrawals, taxes, and long-term retirement income.

The goal isn't necessarily to have the smallest possible RMD.

It's to make sure the money you've saved supports the retirement you want, without paying unnecessary taxes along the way.

Transcript: Prefer to Read — Click to Open

Danny (00:00.046)

But they skip the most important question. Does your RMD actually create a problem? That’s what we’re answering today. We’re gonna work backwards through the numbers and find the exact balance where your RMD starts costing you real money in retirement. Then we’ll project that balance forward because your first RMD is almost always the smallest one you’ll ever take out in retirement. And then we’ll run the same math for a single taxpayer.

That matters even if you’re married today, because one of you will eventually be filing a loan as a single taxpayer. Hey there, my name is Danny Gudorf, owner of Gudorf Financial Group. We’re a total wealth management firm with tax preparers, estate planning attorneys, and financial planners all working under one roof, helping retirees just like you every single day. First, let’s define the problem because a big RMD by itself.

Is not exactly a problem. An RMD becomes a problem when two things happen at the same time in retirement. One, it forces you to pull more out of your IRA than you actually need to live on. Two, that extra income pushes you across the line that costs you more taxes in retirement. Here’s what I mean: say you need $90,000 a year from your IRA to cover your bills.

Your travel and everything else that you want to do in retirement. If your RMD is also $90,000, you don’t really have an RMD problem. The government is making you take money you are already gonna take, anyways. Yes, you’ll pay tax on it, but you are always going to pay tax on that money as well. The problem starts when the government forces money you didn’t need, and that extra money triggers additional taxes.

There are four lines I want to watch for every single client that we work with. Line number one is a tax bracket jump. Our tax system is marginal tax bracket. So crossing into a higher tax bracket does not mean all of your income gets taxed at that higher rate, but some of it jumps and gets taxed at a little bit higher rate for the amount of income that falls in that bracket.

Danny (02:22.39)

And the big one in retirement is the jump from the 12% tax bracket all the way up to the 22% tax bracket. That’s nearly double the tax on every dollar past that line. Line number two we want to watch out for is something called IRMA. That’s the surcharge on your Medicare premiums. And this one is a cliff, unlike your tax rates. Go over the threshold by a single dollar, and your part B and Part D premiums go up.

For the entire year. Line number three is what we call the tax torpedo. That’s what happens when rising income makes more of your Social Security benefits become taxable. In that zone, one extra dollar out of your IRA adds more than one dollar to your taxable income. Line number four that we need to watch out for is something called the widow’s tax trap. Nobody likes to talk about it, but when one spouse’s

Going to outlive the other, and when that happens, the survivor usually keeps most of the IRA, the larger Social Security check, and maybe a pension or other income. But now they’re squeezed into the single filer tax brackets. Roughly the same amount of money, but much narrower brackets. Now let’s run the numbers and see what actually happens. Let’s go through an example.

A married couple both turning 73 and they get $65,000 a year in combined social security benefits and income. At their income level, 85% is already taxable, which is $55,250. They have no pension and no other meaningful income coming in. Everything else comes from their traditional IRA. And we’re gonna work backwards from the line that matters most.

The jump from the 12% to the 22% bracket for 2026, a married couple can have $100,800 of taxable income before they hit that 22% tax bracket. Their deductions total $47,500. That’s the standard deduction, plus the extra amount for being over 65%, plus this new standard senior deduction bonus that we have.

Danny (04:46.188)

Back, and they can have roughly $148,300 of total income before they cross in the 22% tax bracket. Now, take that out, the $55,250 of taxable Social Security. That leaves $93,050. That is how big their RMD can be before it pushes them into the 22% tax bracket. Now

We reverse engineer the IRA balance at age 73 with an RMD factor of roughly 26.5. We multiply the 93,050 by the 26.5, and you get roughly $2,465,825 within an IRA balance. So what does that tell us? This tells us that this couple can start their RMDs with almost $2.5 IRAs.

And their first RMD still won’t push them into the 22% tax bracket. That’s a much higher number than most people expect. A big IRA does not automatically mean you have a RMD crisis. Now, your number depends on your other income. Maybe you have a pension, interest, rental income, and all of that eats into that extra room that you have in that tax bracket. Here’s a simple rule.

For this example. For every extra $10,000 of other income, that lowers the IRA threshold by about $265,000. That’s just 10,000 times the age 73 factor of 26.5. But here’s the catch that you have to watch out for. That’s only a snapshot of year one, and year one is the easy year.

Every year you get older, the RD factor gets smaller and smaller. A smaller factor means a bigger percentage has to come out of your IRA. And at the same time, your IRA is most likely growing. If your investments earn more than what you’re taking out, your balance goes up even while you’re taking your required minimum distributions. So we projected this forward. We assumed a 6% annual growth.

Danny (07:08.546)

With 2.5% inflation and tax and Medicare thresholds that adjust every single year. Real returns won’t come in a straight line, and Congress will change the rules. We know that. But the projection shows you exactly why year one doesn’t tell the whole story. Here’s what we found. At a $2 million IRA, that crosses into the 22% bracket at age 76.

A $1.75 million IRA crosses at age 80. A $1.5 million IRA crosses at age 85. Below about 1.4 million. This couple never crossed that line in our projection. So this couple has plenty of room in their first RD year, and they still run into the 22% tax bracket down the road. For this household,

The real planning number is not two and a half million, it’s closer to 1.5 million dollars. Now, let’s run the same math for a single person. And this is where everything changes. Our single taxpayer is 73 and gets $40,000 a year from Social Security. Same process. We’ll start at the top of the 12% bracket, add back in the deductions, take out

The taxable Social Security benefits and see how much room is left for the RMD. The answer is that a single filer crosses into the 22% bracket in their first RMD year with an IRA of about $1.174 million. Compare that to almost $2.5 million for the married couple, less than half. And when we project it forward, a $1 million IRA.

Crosses that line at age 76. A $780,000 IRA crosses that line at age 85. This is why I run this calculation twice for every married couple I work with. Once as married filing jointly, and once as if either spouse were the survivor filing as a single person. When the first spouse passes away, the income drops but just a little bit. But it does not get cut in half.

Danny (09:31.266)

The smaller Social Security check goes away, but the larger one stays. A pension continues in full or sometimes partway through, depending on which survivor option you chose. The IRA stays mostly intact, but the survivor now has a smaller standard deduction and much narrower tax brackets. And this is where it gets ugly because several rules hit at the same time. In our single filer example,

Adding just $1,000 more dollars to the RMD increased taxable income by $1,934. Why is that? Well, that extra IRA income made more so security taxable and it started phasing out that senior bonus deduction at the same time. The federal tax on that extra thousand dollars is four hundred and twenty-five dollars. That’s a 42.5% marginal tax rate.

For someone who thinks they’re in the 22% tax bracket. Now, not every retiree lands here, but this is exactly what happens when these rules stack on top of each other. If all you look at is the tax bracket charts, you will miss what the next dollar out of your IRA really costs you. So here’s how you run the numbers on your own. Step one, pick the line you want to test. That’s the top of your current tax bracket, an IRMA threshold.

Or any other income line that matters to you. Step two, figure out how much taxable income you can have before you hit that line. Use the deductions for the filing statuses that you’re testing for. Step three, subtract all your taxable income from outside the IRA: pension, interest, wages, rental income, or the taxable portion of your Social Security benefits. What’s left is the room for an RD. Step four.

Multiply that room by the RB factor at your age. At age 73, the factor is 26.5. So if you have $50,000 of room, multiply that $50,000 by $26.5, and that gives you $1.3 million roughly. That’s the IRA balance that starts making a difference for your taxes. Step five, we need to project it forward.

Danny (11:57.576)

Estimate how your IRA grows, how much your RMD percentages rise, and how the thresholds adjust, and what happens when your household income goes from married filing jointly to filing single. Once you know whether you’re crossing a line and when, then you need to pick the right tool. That’s taking IRA withdrawals before your RMD start, or maybe doing rough conversions, or maybe giving to qualified.

Charities through QCDs or qualified charitable distributions. Or for a lot of people, simply spending the RMD because that’s what the money was always meant to be used for. But the diagnosis comes first. Always make sure that you’re measuring and shrinking your future RMD. Shrinking your future RMD is not a win if it costs you more in taxes today than otherwise would.

The goal is to lower the total tax you pay over your lifetime, accounting for Medicare, Social Security, protecting both spouses, including the one who ends up filing a loan. So here’s the bottom line: a big IRA does not mean you have an RMD problem. You have an RMD problem when the government forces out money you don’t need, and that money pushes you over a line that costs you more in taxes and fees. So I want you to answer.

Three questions. Where is your line? When do you cross it? And does your plan still hold up when one of you is filing single? If you want to see how we answer those questions using your actual income, your accounts, your goals, watch our limitless retirement system video. It’s in the top link of the description and in the pinned comment. And it shows you exactly how we do this for people just like you at Gudorf Financial Group. And if this was helpful,

Watch this video next, where I walk you through a 73-year-old couple with $1.5 million and show you exactly how their RB plan changes and the taxes they pay over their entire retirement plan.

Back to All Episodes