Articles

Underestimating the Risk…

Underestimating the Risk of Disability – The Importance of Being Prepared

Underestimating the Risk… No one likes to think about the possibility of their own disability or the disability of a loved one. However, as the statistics below demonstrate, we should all plan for at least a temporary disability. This article examines the eye-opening statistics surrounding disability and some of the common disability planning options. Disability planning is one area where we can give each and every person and family we work with great comfort in knowing that, if they or a loved one becomes disabled, they will be prepared. Most Individuals Will Face At Least a Temporary Disability Study after study confirms that nearly everyone will face at least a temporary disability sometime during their lifetime. More specifically, one in three Americans will face at least a 90-day disability before reaching age 65 and, according to the definitive study in this area, depending upon their ages, up to 44% of Americans will face a disability of up to 4.7 years. On the whole, Americans are up to 3.5 times more likely to become disabled than die in any given year. In raw numbers, over 37 million Americans, or roughly 12% of the total population, are classified as disabled according to the 2010 census. Perhaps surprisingly, more than 50% of those disabled Americans are in their working years, from 18-64. For example, in December 2012, according to the Social Security Administration more than 2.5 million disabled workers in their 20s, 30s, and 40s received SSDI (i.e., disability) benefits. Many Persons Will Face a Long-Term Disability Unfortunately, for many Americans the disability will not be short-lived. According to the 2007 National Home and Hospice Care Survey, conducted by the Centers for Disease Control’s National Center for Health Statistics, over 1.46 million Americans received long term home health care services at any given time in 2007 (the most recent year this information is available). Three-fourths of these patients received skilled care, the highest level of in-home care, and 51% needed help with at least one “activity of daily living” (such as eating, bathing, getting dressed, or the kind of care needed for a severe cognitive impairment like Alzheimer’s disease). The average length of service was more than 300 days, and 69% of in-home patients were 65 years of age or older. Patient age is particularly important as more Americans live past age 65. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration on Aging tells us that Americans over 65 are increasing at an impressive rate: The Department of Health and Human Services also estimates that 9 million Americans over age 65 will need long term care this year. That number is expected to increase to 12 million by 2020. The Department also estimates that 70% of all persons age 65 or older will need some type of long-term care services during their lifetime. The Council for Disability Awareness provides startling examples of how disability is likely to impact “typical” Americans. “A typical female, age 35, 5’4″, 125 pounds, non-smoker, who works mostly an office job, with some outdoor physical responsibilities, and who leads a healthy lifestyle has the following risks: A 24% chance of becoming disabled for 3 months or longer during her working career; with a 38% chance that the disability would last 5 years or longer, and with the average disability for someone like her lasting 82 months. If this same person used tobacco and weighed 160 pounds, the risk would increase to a 41% chance of becoming disabled for 3 months or longer. “A typical male, age 35, 5’10″, 170 pounds, non-smoker, who works an office job, with some outdoor physical responsibilities, and who leads a healthy lifestyle has the following risks: A 21% chance of becoming disabled for 3 months or longer during his working career; with a 38% chance that the disability would last 5 years or longer, and with the average disability for someone like him lasting 82 months. If this same person used tobacco and weighed 210 pounds, the risk would increase to a 45% chance of becoming disabled for 3 months or longer. The Alzheimer’s Factor Alzheimer’s is growing at an alarming rate. Alzheimer’s increased by 46.1% as a cause of death between 2000 and 2006, while causes of death from prostate cancer, breast cancer, heart disease and HIV all declined during that same time period. The 2015 Alzheimer’s Association annual report titled, “Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures” explores different types of dementia, causes and risk factors, and the cost involved in providing health care, among other areas. This report contains some eye-opening statistics: An estimated 5.3 million Americans of all ages have Alzheimer’s disease. This figure includes 5.1 million people aged 65 and older and 200,000 individuals under age 65 who have younger-onset Alzheimer’s. One in nine people age 65 and older (11 percent) has Alzheimer’s disease. About one-third of people age 85 and older (32 percent) have Alzheimer’s disease. Eighty-one percent of people who have Alzheimer’s disease are age 75 or older. The number of people aged 65 and older with Alzheimer’s disease is estimated to reach 7.7 million in 2030 – more than a 50% increase from the 5.1 million aged 65 and older currently affected. Every 67 seconds, someone in the United States develops Alzheimer’s. Thus, approximately 473,000 people age 65 or older developed Alzheimer’s disease in the United States in 2015. By 2050, the number of individuals aged 65 and older with Alzheimer’s is projected to number between 11 million and 16 million – unless medical breakthroughs identify ways to prevent or more effectively treat the disease. Caregivers are at risk of developing health problems. There were approximately 10.9 million unpaid caregivers (family members and friends) providing care to persons with Alzheimer’s or dementia in 2009. According to the Alzheimer’s Association, those persons are at high risk of developing health problems, or worsening existing health issues. For example, family and other unpaid caregivers of people with Alzheimer’s or another dementia are more likely than non-caregivers to have high levels of stress hormones, reduced immune function, slow wound healing, new hypertension and new coronary heart disease. Spouses who are caregivers for the other spouse with Alzheimer’s or other dementia are at greater risk for emergency room visits due to their health deteriorating as the result of providing care. A study mentioned in the 2010 Alzheimer’s Association report found that caregivers of spouses who were hospitalized for dementia were more likely than caregivers of spouses who were hospitalized for other diseases to die in the following year. Receiving care. According to the National Nursing Home Survey 2004 Study, the most recent of its kind, the national average length of stay for nursing home residents is 835 days, with over 56% of nursing home residents staying at least one year. Significantly, only 19% are discharged in less than three months. Those residents who were married or living with a partner at the time of admission had a significantly shorter average stay than those who were widowed, divorced or never married. Likewise, those who lived with a family member prior to admission also had a shorter average stay than those who lived alone prior to admission. While a relatively small number (1.56 million) and percentage (4.5%) of the 65+ population lived in nursing homes in 2000, the percentage increased dramatically with age, ranging from 1.1% for persons 65-74 years to 4.7% for persons 75-84 years and 18.2% for persons 85+. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 68% of nursing home residents were women, and only 16% of all residents were under the age of 65. The median age of residents was 83 years. See Vol. 4 Issue 5 of the Elder Counselor, The Affordable Care Act: How It Impacts Our Senior Population, for a discussion of the Affordable Care Act’s Impact on information regarding nursing homes. Long Term Care Costs Can Be Staggering Not only will many individuals and families face prolonged long term care, in-home care and nursing home costs continue to rise. According to the Genworth 2015 Cost of Care Survey, Assisted Living, Adult Day Services, and Home Care Costs national averages for long term care costs are as follows: Monthly base rate (room and board, two meals per day, housekeeping and personal care assistance) for assisted living care is $43,200 annually, expected to increase .2% annually. Daily rate for a private room in a nursing home is $250, or $91,250 annually, expected to increase 4% annually. Daily rate for a semi-private room in a nursing home is $220, or $80,300 annually, expected to increase 4% annually. Hourly rate for home health aides is $21.50, expected to increase 4% annually. These costs vary significantly by region, and thus it is critical to know the costs where the individual will receive care. For example, the median annual cost for a private room in the state of California during 2015 was $104,025, whereas the median cost for a year in a semi private room was nearly $90,000. Most Americans Underestimate the Risk Perhaps most importantly, despite overwhelming and compelling statistics; most Americans grossly underestimate the risk of disability to themselves and to their loved ones. According to the Council on Disability Awareness 2010 survey: 64% of wage earners believe they have a 2% or less chance of being disabled for 3 months or more during their working career; the actual odds for a worker entering the workforce today are closer to 25%. Most working Americans estimate that their own chances of experiencing a long-term disability are substantially lower than the average worker’s. Given the high costs of care, this underestimation often leaves Americans ill prepared to pay for the costs of long-term care. Long Term Care Insurance May Cover These Costs If a parent, their spouse, or family member needs long term care, the cost could easily deplete and/or extinguish the family’s hard-earned assets. Alternatively, seniors (or their families) can pay for long term care completely or in part through long term care insurance. Most long-term care insurance plans let the individual choose the amount of the coverage she wants, as well as how and where she can use her benefits. A comprehensive plan includes benefits for all levels of care, custodial to skilled. Clients can receive care in a variety of settings, including the person’s home, assisted living facilities, adult day care centers or hospice facilities. Planning in the Event Long Term Care Insurance is Unavailable or Insufficient Unfortunately, many older Americans will either be medically ineligible for long term care insurance or unable to afford the premiums. In that event, more aggressive planning should be considered as early as possible to make sure life savings are not depleted as a result of having to pay out-of-pocket for care. With the help of an elder law attorney, a plan can be created that will protect much of the assets of an individual or couple that would otherwise be at risk of being depleted. All Planning Should Thoroughly Address Disability When a person becomes disabled; he or she is often unable to make personal and/or financial decisions. If the disabled person cannot make these decisions, someone must have the legal authority to do so. Otherwise, the family must apply to the court for appointment of a guardian over the person or property, or both. Those who are old enough to remember the public guardianship proceedings for Groucho Marx recognize the need to avoid a guardianship proceeding if at all possible. At a minimum, seniors need broad powers of attorney that will allow agents to handle all of their property upon disability, as well as the appointment of a decision-maker for health care decisions (the name of the legal document varies by state, but all accomplish the same thing). Alternatively, a fully funded revocable trust can ensure that the senior’s person and property will be cared for as desired, pursuant to the highest duty under the law – that of a trustee. Conclusion The above discussion outlines the minimum planning everyone, including seniors and their loved ones, should consider in preparation for a possible disability. It is imperative that families work with a team of professional advisors (legal, medical and financial) to ensure that, in light of their unique goals and objectives, their planning addresses all aspects of a potential disability. Our firm is dedicated to helping seniors and their loved ones work through these issues and implement sound legal planning to address them. If we can help in any way, please don’t hesitate to contact our office. To comply with the U.S. Treasury regulations, we must inform you that (i) any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this newsletter was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal tax penalties that may be imposed on such person and (ii) each taxpayer should seek advice from their tax advisor based on the taxpayer’s particular circumstances. Read More
Read More
Your Vacation Checklist

Your Vacation Checklist

Your Vacation Checklist You’ve packed sunblock and a beach novel. You’ve planned your itinerary and bought plane tickets. But have you ensured that your estate plan is up to date? Don’t leave home without making sure your financial health and the future of your loved ones is provided for. It’s even more crucial than getting a pet sitter and locking the front door. Creating an Estate Plan If you don’t have an estate plan yet, don’t panic. Now is a great time to connect with a qualified estate planning attorney who can sit down with you and get you started with an appropriate plan for your financial future. Here are some questions to begin the process: Do you have a will? An attorney can help you create an accurate and intentional will if you do not already have one. Have you considered using a trust? Trusts have considerable benefits, from keeping assets safe from creditors to dividing an estate equally without worrying about the status of individual assets. Are your children protected? An attorney can help you designate a guardian to care for your minor child in the event you are unable to. An attorney can also help you name an adult who will manage your minor child’s inherited property if you pass away. These may or may not be the same people. Have you considered life insurance? If you anticipate leaving behind significant debt or hefty estate taxes, or if you have small children, you may want to consider a life insurance policy. Knowing your dependents are provided for will give you peace of mind. Is your business protected? If you own a business, have you named a proxy to manage your interest if you cannot? Do you have a business succession plan? If you co-own a business, have you drawn up a buyout agreement? An attorney can help with that as well. Pour-Over Wills: A Useful Tool Considering a trust-based estate plan? It’s a great way to ensure that your assets are divided and protected in exactly the way you want. It can also help your beneficiaries avoid the expensive and lengthy process of probate, when an estate must be organized and distributed through a probate court. But as you may know, gathering the needed documents may be time-consuming. If you need to complete an estate plan before leaving on a vacation and are unable to fully fund your trust, you may want to consider using a pour-over will in the interim. A pour-over will stipulates that all assets that have not yet been funded into your trust will be put there when you pass away. Your trust becomes the beneficiary of any assets that you may not have had time to transfer there. In a crunch, it can serve as a stop-gap measure while your trust-based plan is being funded. Trust, but Verify Have you already created an estate plan? That’s great! It’s still important to verify that all provisions made in the estate plan are exactly as you want them. Here are some items to confirm before leaving town: Are your assets accurately inventoried? Have you left out any important assets or neglected to report changes? Are your beneficiary designations accurate? Are your assets going where you would like them to? When was the last time you reviewed your selection of fiduciaries? Being named as someone’s Personal Representative, Successor Trustee, Agent under a Power of Attorney, etc. can be a time-consuming job. It is important that you review your selections periodically to ensure that those people are still the best choice to act on your behalf. Contact Us Today Estate planning with a trusted attorney is an important part of ensuring your financial health and preserving the legacy you’d like to leave to your loved ones. As you’re preparing for summer travel, don’t neglect your estate plan. Read More
Read More
Your personal property memorandum

Your Personal Property Memorandum: 4 Tips for Success

Your personal property memorandum What is a personal property memorandum? It is a frequently-used estate planning document that provides an opportunity to expand upon your will or trust. Many wills or trusts simply divide the whole of an estate equally between surviving family members. But what if you’d prefer a more detailed plan for particular items you want to leave to specific individuals? If you’d like to ensure that specific property or items in your estate are left to certain relatives or friends, a personal property memorandum is a great option. It’s a detailed accounting of items of personal property listed with the corresponding person you’d like to receive those items. It’s simple but powerful, and we can assist you in making one. The best personal property memorandum will work in concert with your will or trust to bequeath your estate and belongings exactly as you want. Further, it must be referenced in the will or trust to be effective. Here are four tips we need to consider that’ll ensure your memorandum works as desired. Use detail When preparing your memorandum, include specific, detailed descriptions of each piece of property. For example, if describing a car, it’s best to add identifying descriptors such as model year, model number, and color. When conveying that you’d like someone to receive a piano, rather than simply “piano,” write “my black 1980 Steinway grand piano.” For an even more exact description, you may choose to include a photograph, especially if you own many similar items. Be specific about who will receive the item Because a personal property memorandum is a legal document, you’ll want to use a full legal name and relationship. Avoid confusion that could arise from listing only a relationship, using a nickname, or other ambiguity. Your list will be clearest if you write “my daughter, Emily Smith,” as opposed to just “Emily.” Readers of the memorandum will know your intent without a doubt if they see “my daughter, Emily Smith, to receive my 1980 black Steinway grand piano.” Remember, when the memorandum becomes effective, you’ll be deceased so no one will be able to ask you for clarification. Update your property memorandum frequently For this document to be useful, it must be current. If you give away an item, to the eventual recipient or otherwise, sell an item, or if an item is lost, stolen, or destroyed, such as by fire or flood, it’s time to amend your memorandum. If you find yourself needing to make significant changes to your memorandum, one helpful approach is to photocopy the original, make notes on the photocopy about changes you’d like to make, then use the notes to produce a new, updated memorandum. It is important that the updated personal property memorandum include all of the specific items you want distributed to the named individuals. Once you’ve concluded this process, you can avoid any confusion by shredding the old memorandum— but of course, before shredding any estate planning document, check with a us. Ask for help If your personal property memorandum creates any challenges, such as an item or collection that’s difficult to describe, contact us. We’re here to help, and we can make sure your estate plan works just as you intend. We hope these tips have been helpful. Your personal property memorandum can be an important document in the execution of your estate plan. But it must be detailed, accurate, up to date and mentioned in your will or trust to be effective. As always, we’re here to provide personal, tailored advice as you create this essential document. Read More
Read More
Estate planning for college students and other young adults

Estate Plans for College Students and Other Young Adults

Estate planning for college students and other young adults Why It’s the Perfect Time to Set Your Kids Up for Success As summer break swiftly approaches, the parents of young adults experience a mixed bag of emotions. It can be exciting to see your children branching out and becoming successful adults in their own right — a time full of hard work and self-discovery that hopefully lays the groundwork for a fulfilling career in the coming years. But it can also be a time of anxiety for some parents. We all want to know that we are doing absolutely everything we can to make sure our kids stay safe, healthy, and secure so they can pursue their dreams to the fullest. Preparing for legal adulthood Whether your child is just turning the corner on their senior year of high-school or they’re already in the midst of their undergraduate studies, their 18th birthday undoubtedly marks the transition to adulthood when it comes to their legal affairs. This can impact you as their parent in a few distinct ways: Medical decisions: When your children become legal adults, you no longer have the authority to know their medical details or make healthcare decisions on their behalf. Without proper legal documents in place, you may need to petition a court to be named as guardian or conservator — a time consuming, expensive, and distracting process. Probate: Many young people own cars, have a checking or savings account, and have life insurance — assets that could end up in a probate court if inadequate planning, like only using the beneficiary form at the insurance company, is done. A basic trust may be all that’s necessary now for your children’s estates. Some people are concerned about planning “too early.” But, since revocable trusts can be updated as your child’s circumstances change, there’s never really a time that’s too early. By working with your children now, you’ll instill a great habit of being proactive when it comes to legal affairs while providing protection for your family along the way. A simple way forward Turning 18 isn’t just an opportunity to be able to vote or serve in the military. It’s also the first-time individuals need to come in and have a conversation about estate planning. As a parent, it’s an opportunity to help your child enter the world of adulthood and maturity. It also presents a unique opportunity for families to work together toward a common goal and can serve as a bond-strengthening experience for parents and children alike. Here are some of the preliminary documents we can use to lay the foundation of your children’s estate plans: Asset inventory: Asset inventories are a great way to get the ball rolling for those brand new to estate planning. Include assets like insurance policies, valuable or meaningful personal property or heirlooms, savings accounts, real estate, investments, and retirement plans. Basic will: Wills contain instructions for the management and distribution of assets after death. However, since wills must go through probate, they are usually not a great planning tool for most people. Living will: This document records the individual’s wishes in the event of terminal incapacity. Revocable trust: A revocable living trust is a great way to keep an individual’s assets out of reach from potential court interference. And since they are revocable, these trusts can be altered as often as necessary throughout the course of one’s life. Financial power of attorney: A financial power of attorney is the document used to appoint a person to handle the individual’s financial affairs. Healthcare power of attorney: This type of power of attorney covers medical decision-making that could impact an individual’s health and lifestyle if they become unable to make those decisions themselves due to mental or physical impairment. In concert with a revocable trust, a financial power of attorney and healthcare power of attorney can provide a powerful plan for incapacity that sometimes strikes younger people (like the well-known case of Terri Schiavo, who became legally incapacitated in her late 20s). Now is the right time to act Estate planning for young adults doesn’t need to be prohibitively expensive or time-consuming. Work with us to build a comprehensive plan so you and your children can get back to the business of being in such an exciting part of life. Whether your children are returning from spring break trips or getting ready for graduation in a few months’ time, now is a great opportunity to give us a call today to discuss how we can work together to keep your children and family fully protected, no matter what life brings their way. Read More
Read More
Man and woman at a table with a child in an electric wheel chair

7 Tips for Helping Families with Special Needs

Man and woman at a table with a child in an electric wheel chair This article examines the unique planning requirements of families with children, grandchildren or other family members (such as parents) with special needs. There are numerous misconceptions in this area that can result in costly mistakes when planning for special needs beneficiaries. Understanding the pitfalls associated with special needs planning is a must for all of us who assist families who have loved ones with special needs. Tip #1: Avoid disinheriting the special needs beneficiary. Many disabled persons receive Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”), Medicaid or other government benefits to provide food, shelter and/or medical care. The loved ones of the special needs beneficiaries may have been advised to disinherit them – beneficiaries who need their help most – to protect those beneficiaries’ public benefits. But these benefits rarely provide more than basic needs. And this solution (which normally involves leaving the inheritance to another sibling) does not allow loved ones to help their special needs beneficiaries after they themselves become incapacitated or die. The best solution is for loved ones to create a special needs trust to hold the inheritance of a special needs beneficiary. Planning Note: It is unnecessary and in fact poor planning to disinherit special needs beneficiaries. Loved ones with special needs beneficiaries should consider a special needs trust to protect public benefits and care for those beneficiaries during their own incapacity or after their death. Tip #2: Procrastinating can be costly for a special needs beneficiary. None of us know when we may die or become incapacitated. It is important for loved ones with a special needs beneficiary to plan early, just as they should for other dependents such as minor children. However, unlike most other beneficiaries, special needs beneficiaries may never be able to compensate for a failure to plan. Minor beneficiaries without special needs can obtain more resources as they reach adulthood and can work to meet essential needs, but special needs beneficiaries may never have that ability. Planning Note: Parents, grandparents, or any other loved ones of a special needs beneficiary face unique planning challenges when it comes to that child. This is one area where families simply cannot afford to wait to plan. Tip #3: Don’t ignore the special needs of the beneficiary when planning. Planning that is not designed with the beneficiary’s special needs in mind will probably render the beneficiary ineligible for essential government benefits. A properly designed special needs trust promotes the comfort and happiness of the special needs beneficiary without sacrificing eligibility. Special needs can include medical and dental expenses, annual independent check-ups, necessary or desirable equipment (for example, a specially equipped van), training and education, insurance, transportation and essential dietary needs. If the trust is sufficiently funded, the disabled person can also receive spending money, electronic equipment & appliances, computers, vacations, movies, payments for a companion, and other self-esteem and quality-of-life enhancing expenses: the sorts of things families now provide to their child or other special needs beneficiary. Planning Note: When planning for a beneficiary with special needs, it is critical that families utilize a properly drafted special needs trust as the vehicle to pass assets to that beneficiary. Otherwise, those assets may disqualify the beneficiary from public benefits and may be available to repay the state for the assistance provided. Tip #4: A special needs trust does not have to be inflexible. Some special needs trusts are unnecessarily inflexible and generic. Although an attorney with some knowledge of the area can protect almost any trust from invalidating the beneficiary’s public benefits, many trusts are not customized to the particular beneficiary’s needs. Thus, the beneficiary fails to receive the benefits that the parents or others provided when they were alive. Another frequent mistake occurs when the special needs trust includes a pay-back provision rather than allowing the remainder of the trust to go to others upon the death of the special needs beneficiary. While these pay-back provisions are necessary in certain types of special needs trusts, an attorney who knows the difference can save family members and loved ones hundreds of thousands of dollars, or more. Planning Note: A special needs trust should be customized to meet the unique circumstances of the special needs beneficiary and should be drafted by a lawyer familiar with this area of the law. Tip #5: Use great caution in choosing a trustee. Loved ones or family members can manage the special needs trust while alive and well if they are willing to serve and have proper training and guidance. Once the family member or loved one is no longer able to serve as trustee, they can choose who will serve according to the instructions provided in the trust. Families or loved ones who create a special needs trust may choose a team of advisors and/or a professional trustee to serve. Whomever they choose, it is crucial that the trustee is financially savvy, well-organized and of course, ethical. Planning Note: The trustee of a special needs trust should understand the trustmaker’s objectives and be qualified to invest the assets in a manner most likely to meet those objectives. Tip #6: Invite others to contribute to the special needs trust. A key benefit of creating a special needs trust now is that the beneficiary’s extended family and friends can make gifts to the trust or remember the trust as they plan their own estates. For example, these family members and friends can name the special needs trust as the beneficiary of their own assets in their revocable trust or will, and they can also name the special needs trust as a beneficiary of life insurance or retirement benefits. Unfortunately, many extended family members may not be aware that a trust exists, or that they could contribute money to the special needs trust now or as an inheritance later. Planning Note: Creating a special needs trust now allows others, such as grandparents and other family members, to name the trust as the beneficiary of their own estate planning. Tip #7: Relying on siblings to use their money for the benefit of a special needs child can have serious adverse effects. Many family members rely on their other children to provide, from their own inheritances, for a child with special needs. This can be a temporary solution for a brief time, such as during a brief incapacity if their other children are financially secure and have money to spare. However, it is not a solution that will protect a child with special needs after the death of the parents or when siblings have their own expenses and financial priorities. What if an inheriting sibling divorces or loses a lawsuit? His or her spouse (or a judgment creditor) may be entitled to half of it and will likely not care for the child with special needs. What if the sibling dies or becomes incapacitated while the child with special needs is still living? Will his or her heirs care for the child with special needs as thoughtfully and completely as the sibling did? Siblings of a child with special needs often feel a great responsibility for that child and have felt so all of their lives. When parents provide clear instructions and a helpful structure, they lessen the burden on all their children and support a loving and involved relationship among them. Planning Note: Relying on siblings to care for a special needs beneficiary is a short-term solution at best. A special needs trust ensures that the assets are available for the special needs beneficiary (and not the former spouse or judgment creditor of a sibling) in a manner intended by the parents. Bonus Tip: Stay up to date on changes in the law. The rules applicable to special needs trusts are constantly changing. Most recently, the Social Security Administration changed the rules on special needs trusts that are created using assets of the special needs beneficiary (called a “self-settled special needs trust”). The new Social Security regulations require certain provisions to be present in any self-settled trust drafted after January 1, 2000 that allows for early termination of the trust (termination prior to the death of the special needs beneficiary). If these required provisions are not in the trust, the special needs beneficiary could lose SSI or Medicaid eligibility. The new regulations go into effect October 1, 2010. Please contact us if you have questions about the new regulations or if you would like more information on the changes. Planning Note: A change in the Social Security Administration regulations governing self-settled special needs trusts could render some existing trusts invalid for SSI or Medicaid purposes. It is imperative to stay up to date on changes in the rules that apply to special needs trusts to ensure the benefits received by a special needs beneficiary are not jeopardized as a result of changes in the law. Conclusion. Planning for a special needs beneficiary requires particular care and knowledge on the part of the planning team. A properly drafted and funded special needs trust can ensure that special needs beneficiary has sufficient assets to care for him or her, in a manner intended by loved ones, throughout the beneficiary’s lifetime. Please contact us if you have any questions or would like to discuss any information in this newsletter further. To comply with the U.S. Treasury regulations, we must inform you that (i) any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this newsletter was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal tax penalties that may be imposed on such person and (ii) each taxpayer should seek advice from their tax advisor based on the taxpayer’s particular circumstances. Read More
Read More
Want to connect with your clients? Make it simple.

Want to Connect with Your Clients? Make It Simple

Want to connect with your clients? Make it simple. Estate planning is a complex, nuanced process. Properly done, it requires a specialized team of experts in investment, tax, and legal strategy. At its center, however, is the client and their particular needs, hopes, and goals. It’s vital that over the course of working together, you engage your client and help them gain comfort and understanding of the process. Delving into a client’s plan together is a great opportunity to interact more closely. Be an Active Listener As an experienced financial advisor, you may feel as if you’ve heard and seen it all. But every client is unique. Each one’s story, background, goals, hopes and fears are different, and it’s up to you to ensure you’re getting all the necessary information before proceeding with the next steps. If you’re not entering client consultations with the goal of being an active listener, you could be setting yourself up to miss critical details. Here are some tips for connecting with your clients’ stories and needs: Don’t assume you know what they’re about to say next. Each story is different, and even for those stories that seem the same, clients value feeling heard and understood. Ask questions. Get more details and a deeper understanding of what the client has shared. Pause to recap what the client has said, verifying that you’ve understood correctly. Rephrase what you’ve heard. Do Your Homework Once you’ve got the minutiae of your client’s requirements, it’s time to craft a custom solution that will help to secure the future for them and for their families for generations to come. Before you get started, though, research is imperative. Doing your due diligence will ensure that when you bring your solution to your client, it’s with confidence and readiness to get into the nitty-gritty. The more prepared you are, the better you’ll be able to explain the nuances of the plan. For example, if a client’s best bet is to pursue a charitable strategy with their assets, you’ll need to immerse yourself in the specific benefits of that strategy before moving forward with the client. Take a Holistic Approach When delving into complex financial strategies and solutions with clients, technical jargon shouldn’t be your first mode of communicating. Using images, stories, and real world examples instead makes you relatable to clients and encourages buy-in. A visual representation may help clients absorb the intricacies of a financial plan. Similarly, sharing an account illustrating a strategy or requirement similar to the client’s own may shed more light. These methods can provoke deeper dialogue and engagement. Everyone learns differently, and you’ll want to use all the available tools to be the best trusted advisor you can be to your clients. Work as a Team Your client’s advisory team is a valuable asset when delving together into complex solutions. Most strategies require alignment of investment, tax, and legal strategies to generate the greatest effect. Collaboration and the resulting synergy across plans means a more thorough strategy, a better informed client, and a superior outcome. The other members of the team are there to help make certain that a potentially confusing strategy becomes manageable and comprehensible for the client. You know the ins and outs of financial planning, and that’s what makes you valuable to your client. Be the best ally you can be to your clients by working with us to coordinate your client’s financial and legal plans. We’re here to help as you deepen relationships and help clients make the best choices for their futures. Read More
Read More
Good news regarding Ohio's 529 Plan and Taxes

Good News Regarding Ohio's 529 Plan and Taxes

Good news regarding Ohio's 529 Plan and Taxes In late 2017, the U.S. Congress passed the federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). Some months later, the Ohio legislature passed, and the governor signed into law, S.B. 22, which incorporated into Ohio income tax law some of the changes in federal tax law. Among the contents of S.B. 22 were provisions that will have an impact on Ohio’s 529 plan and taxes. The changes are favorable for Ohio taxpayers, so if you missed them in the wake of all the other tax changes at the time, it is worth taking a look going forward. Many of the changes to federal and Ohio tax law benefited businesses, but there was good news for individual taxpayers and families, too. If you are among the Ohio taxpayers who has paid into a 529 plan for your child’s education, you probably did so with an eye toward paying for college expenses. However, the changes in the law have expanded your options for using those funds. What is a 529 Plan? There are two types of 529 plans, named for the section of the Tax Code that authorizes them. One is a prepaid tuition plan; the other is an investment account in which a parent, grandparent or other person can save for a beneficiary’s future qualified higher education expenses. Over time, the investment account variety of 529 plan has become the more widely-used option, with most people using the funds to pay not only college tuition, but other qualified expenses such as room and board and mandatory fees. 529 savings plans vary from state to state, and you need not live in a particular state to save and invest with that state’s plan. For example, Ohio’s 529 plan, called CollegeAdvantage, can be used by both Ohioans and those outside the state. 529 plans work by investing your financial contribution in mutual-fund based investments. Your account value is based on the performance of the investments. Some plans, including CollegeAdvantage, also offer FDIC-insured banking options for savers who are more risk-averse. Funds from a 529 savings plan can be used at almost any U.S. college or university, as well as some outside of the country. However, the funds in a 529 plan account can also be put toward tuition at a public, private, or religious elementary or secondary school, grades K-12. The limitation for such payments is $10,000 per beneficiary, per year. But until the recent changes in the law, those earnings were income tax-exempt only to the extent that they were applied to qualified higher education expenses for a beneficiary. Part of the reason for the popularity of 529 plans was that their earnings were exempt from federal and state income tax; if you invested when your child was small, and later used the earnings to pay for college expenses, you would realize a tremendous tax benefit. But until the recent changes in the law, those earnings were income tax-exempt only to the extent that they were applied to qualified higher education expenses for a beneficiary. In other words, earnings in a 529 investment account could be used to pay for K-12 educational expenses, but they would be subject to federal and state income tax. Unsurprisingly, this rule made funds from a 529 plan account much less attractive to use for elementary or secondary school expenses. What’s New After S.B. 22 The TCJA allows account owners to use 529 plan earnings for qualifying K-12 tuition and expenses. S.B. 22 extends the favorable tax treatment enjoyed for payment of college expenses to these primary and secondary school payments. Without the provisions of S.B. 22, those payments would be required to be added back to Ohio adjusted gross income (AGI), stripping them of much of their benefit. Considering that parents may be paying these expenses for multiple children for more than a decade, the changes created by S.B. 22 are good news for Ohio families. Tax laws are constantly evolving. In order to plan for your loved ones’ future while realizing the greatest tax benefit, it is helpful to schedule periodic consultations with an experienced estate planning and tax planning attorney. If you have questions about tax planning or 529 plans, we invite you to contact Gudorf Law Group. Read More
Read More
How to coordinate your retirement and estate plans

How to Coordinate Your Retirement and Estate Plans

How to coordinate your retirement and estate plans We often think of retirement accounts as monolithic resources. It is easy to see why – we spend our working years socking away money for our future. Unfortunately, though, the rising cost of healthcare can quickly deplete even the largest of retirement funds. Because retirement accounts tend to be the largest assets in a person’s estate, it is crucial that proper planning is done to handle one’s retirement fund. The first thing you need to do is ensure you have the assets you need to take care of yourself and your family. With the increased costs of healthcare, it is crucial you have what you need after you retire and can manage your medical expenses on a fixed income. While we would all hope for a quiet retirement, finances can be unexpectedly stressful. In addition to budgeting out a financial strategy to keep you comfortable during retirement, we can also work with your financial advisor to help you develop a strategy for distributing any leftover funds upon your death. In addition, the rules surrounding the taxation of retirement accounts can be difficult to understand, further complicating a potentially stressful retirement experience. Upon retiring, you will have to take a required minimum distribution, which will be subject to income tax. Most people are used to having income tax withheld from their paychecks, but sometimes overlook that they will still have a similar tax liability for their retirement account. It is also important that your strategy for passing on the account takes into consideration the tax consequences. As mentioned above, because these accounts are created with pre-tax contributions, the required minimum distributions made to the owner are subject to income tax. When these funds are distributed to a designated beneficiary after the owner’s death, there are still income tax concerns regardless of who is named as the designated beneficiary. It’s why working with a trusted financial advisor and attorney is so important to enjoying your golden years. With these experts on your side, you’ll rest easy knowing you’ve taken care of your family in the present and future. Ultimately, you will benefit most from ensuring your retirement plan and estate plan align. By working with your trusted financial advisor and us, you can ensure the goals you have for your retirement and for your estate do not contradict one another. For example, you may have designated one beneficiary for your account when you signed up for your 401k but may now wish to change who or how the beneficiary will receive your assets upon your death. Or, you may have originally anticipated the excess funds from your retirement account being used to care for an aging loved one, but due to the market, you may need to find additional sources to cover these anticipated expenses. Meeting with your financial advisor and us is crucial to making sure your family and loved ones are not stuck in financial hardship after you have passed. When it comes to retirement, it can be difficult to know what you do not know. If you are concerned about the state of your retirement account, assets and estate plan, schedule a meeting with your financial advisor and us today. With so much on the line, it pays to do your homework, connect with professionals and ensure your final wishes are documented and respected. Read More
Read More
Road sign affordable care act

Federal Judge Declares the Affordable Care Act Unconstitutional

Road sign affordable care act On December 14, 2018, a federal judge in Texas ruled that the entire Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as ObamaCare, is unconstitutional because of a recent change in federal tax law. The opinion, by U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor, overturns all of the law nationwide. If the ruling stands, it will create widespread disruption across the U.S health-care system, potentially upending hundreds of provisions in the law that was a prized domestic achievement of President Barack Obama. In this article we will explain how this ruling came about, how the ruling might affect seniors, and what we can expect going forward. Explaining the Ruling In 2010, the ACA created an individual mandate to expand health insurance coverage, along with Medicaid expansion and subsidies for moderate and low-income households. The mandate required most Americans to maintain “minimum essential” coverage, enforced through a “shared responsibility payment” in the form of a tax. In short, those who chose not to have health insurance were required to pay a tax penalty. In 2012, the Supreme Court’s Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. wrote that the penalty the law created for Americans who do not carry health insurance is constitutional because Congress “does have the power to impose a tax on those without health insurance.” (In that same ruling, the Court struck down the ACA’s provision that was set to expand Medicaid nationwide, instead of letting each state decide on its own whether to participate in Medicaid expansion.) In December 2017, Congress enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act which reduced the tax penalty to $0, effectively eliminating the individual mandate. In June 2018, the Texas Attorney General, joined by 18 additional Republican state attorneys general and two governors, filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Their lawsuit argued that with the enforcement of the insurance requirement gone, there is no longer a tax, so the law is no longer constitutional. “Once the heart of the ACA—the individual mandate—is declared unconstitutional, the remainder of the ACA must also fail,” their lawsuit states. Judge O’Connor agreed. He wrote that the individual mandate is unconstitutional, saying that it “can no longer be fairly read as an exercise of Congress’ tax power.” He concluded that this insurance requirement “is essential to and inseverable from the remainder of the ACA,” and declared the entire ACA unconstitutional. Texas Attorney General Paxton praised the ruling, saying that it “halts an unconstitutional exertion of federal power over the American health care system” so that Congress can have “the opportunity to replace the failed social experiment with a plan that ensures Texans and all Americans will again have a greater choice about what health coverage they need and who will be their doctor.” The decision was announced in the closing hours of open enrollment, which led to some confusion for last-minute enrollees. The White House issued a statement to alleviate concerns, saying, “We expect this ruling will be appealed to the Supreme Court. Pending the appeal process, the law remains in place.” The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) also issued a statement that the court’s ruling was “not an injunction that halts the enforcement of the law and not a final judgment” and said the agency would “continue administering and enforcing all aspects of the ACA.” What Happens Next? The ACA has already made its way twice to the U.S. Supreme Court, once in 2012 and again in 2015, and it does appear to be headed there again. California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, a Democrat and former U.S. Congressman, is leading a group of states defending the ACA and is challenging the ruling in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit. Colorado, Iowa, Michigan, and Nevada recently joined California and 16 other Democrat state attorneys general in the appeal. The U.S. House of Representatives has also moved to intervene as a defendant. The Democrats contend that while the Republican tax law eliminates the federal penalty for being uninsured, it does not negate the entire ACA’s constitutionality. They also argue that Congress intended to keep the ACA in place when it set the individual mandate penalty to zero while leaving the rest of the law intact. Judge O’Connor’s ruling goes beyond the Trump administration’s legal position in the case. In a June 2018 court brief, Justice Department officials contended that once the insurance mandate’s penalty is gone, the ACA’s consumer protections, such as its ban on charging more or refusing to cover people with pre-existing medical conditions, would be invalidated. However, they stated that many other parts of the law could be considered legally distinct and therefore continue. Typically, the executive branch argues for upholding existing statutes in court cases, but in this case, the administration took the unusual step of telling the court that it will not defend the ACA against this latest challenge. The Trump administration has been taking steps on its own to foster alternative insurance that would be less expensive because it does not have certain ACA requirements. After the ruling, President Trump encouraged Congress to pass a “strong law that provides great healthcare and protects pre-existing conditions.” In its statement, the HHS added that the administration “stands ready to work with Congress on policy solutions that will deliver more insurance choices, better health care, and lower costs while continuing to protect individuals with pre-existing conditions.” How Would Ending the ACA Affect Seniors? Many experts are skeptical that this decision will ultimately be upheld by the Supreme Court. However, if the Court does determine that the ACA is unconstitutional after eight years of implementation, almost every aspect of health care as we know it today would be affected. For example, the ACA provided: Coverage for more than 19 million people who were previously uninsured; Protections for people with pre-existing conditions; Insurance marketplaces and premium subsidies for low- and modest-income people; Expansion of Medicaid eligibility for low-income adults; Coverage of preventive services with no cost-sharing for those enrolled in private insurance, Medicare and Medicaid expansion; Phase-out of the “doughnut hole” gap in Medicare drug coverage and reductions in the growth of Medicare costs (see below); and New national initiatives to promote public health and quality of care, including programs to fight obesity, curb tobacco use, prevent the onset of chronic conditions such as diabetes and heart disease, promote immunization, and detect and respond to infectious diseases and other public health threats. Without a replacement for the ACA, it is estimated that over 4.5 million older adults age 55-64 who have coverage through the marketplaces and Medicaid expansion would lose access to health care. For millions more, health care would become either unaffordable or unattainable because health insurance companies would again be permitted to charge seniors based on age, and increase premiums or deny coverage to the 8 out of 10 older adults with a pre-existing condition. There would also likely be changes to Medicare that would affect millions of seniors, including: Increase in Part A deductibles and copayments, as well as Part B premiums and deductibles paid by beneficiaries. The ACA included provisions that adjusted the rate of growth in payments to hospitals and other healthcare providers. Should the ruling be upheld, provider costs could be expected to resume growing at faster rates, causing out-of-pocket costs to climb more rapidly for beneficiaries. Medicare premiums would take a greater share of Social Security benefits. Part B premiums grow several times faster than annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs), which in some years can mean less Social Security income to meet other household budget needs. Increase in cost-sharing for Part B preventive benefits. The ACA included a number of provisions that provide free coverage for some preventive benefits, such as screening for breast and colorectal cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes. These free screenings could end, and beneficiaries would be expected to have higher costs in screening for these diseases. Increase in spending by Part D enrollees who hit the doughnut hole coverage gap. Before the ACA, beneficiaries who had drug spending high enough to reach the Part D doughnut hole paid 100% of the full retail cost of brand name and generic drugs until they spent the annual out-of-pocket threshold to qualify for catastrophic coverage. The ACA provided new discounts on brand name drugs in the coverage gap and slowed the growth in the out-of-pocket threshold required for catastrophic coverage. If the ACA ruling is upheld, beneficiaries would likely again be charged 100% of the undiscounted full retail price of their prescription drugs until they qualify for catastrophic coverage. End to new sources of funding for Medicare Trust Funds. The ACA established a 0.9% increase in the Medicare payroll tax on high-earnings workers, a 3.8% tax on net investment income for higher income taxpayers, and a fee on manufacturers and importers of brand name drugs. These generated additional revenue for the Part B Trust Fund ($3 billion in 2015). Before passage of the ACA, Medicare trustees predicted that the Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund would not have sufficient revenues to pay all Part A benefits by 2017. The current insolvency date is projected to be 2026, but if the ACA were overturned, this stream of revenue would cease. Opposition to the ACA is Not New The ACA has not been without its critics from the beginning. While some of the provisions have proven to be popular with consumers, there were complaints that it was too expensive and intruded on the freedom of choice. Some think the marketplaces are collapsing and, in some areas, only one plan is offered. Many complained early on that they could not keep the plan and doctors they had and liked. Some were “forced” onto Medicaid through the marketplaces when they did not want to be on Medicaid. Also, many have seen their health care premiums and out-of-pocket costs skyrocket, as they are required to pay for services for others that they do not use. However, many Americans lauded the ACA as a big step in the right direction to providing affordable quality healthcare for all. What to Watch The appeal process will take time, possibly years before it reaches the Supreme Court. In the meantime, the ACA will stay in effect. However, there may be some renewed interest in creating a replacement for the ACA that offers consumers more choices while keeping costs down and protecting those with pre-existing conditions. Conclusion We care deeply about issues that affect the elderly, the disabled, and our Veterans. We will continue to watch future developments in health care and how they affect our most vulnerable, and we will keep you informed. Sources https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/federal-judge-in-texas-rules-obama-health-care-law-unconstitutional/2018/12/14/9e8bb5a2-fd63-11e8-862a-b6a6f3ce8199_story.html?utm_term=.93259d1141c9 https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2018/12/14/677002085/texas-judge-rules-affordable-care-act-unconstitutional-but-supporters-vow-to-app https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/1/4/18168543/obamacare-unconstitutional-texas-judge-new-congress-2019 http://www.justiceinaging.org/justice-in-aging-statement-on-affordable-care-act-decision-in-texas/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=ea4dc7d7-d2b7-41b9-b1b2-590ac9f3b5c6&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=9416a5ee-e6af-40fb-b767-3ebcf215acca&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=647edb66-16a6-4be7-8a03-ebe1a191cbd8 https://newsatjama.jama.com/2018/12/17/jama-forum-texas-v-united-states-the-affordable-care-act-is-constitutional-and-will-remain-so/ https://www.kff.org/health-reform/fact-sheet/potential-impact-of-texas-v-u-s-decision-on-key-provisions-of-the-affordable-care-act/ https://www.aafp.org/news/government-medicine/20181218acaruling.html https://seniorsleague.org/striking-obamacare-mean-medicare/ To comply with the U.S. Treasury regulations, we must inform you that (i) any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this newsletter was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal tax penalties that may be imposed on such person and (ii) each taxpayer should seek advice from their tax advisor based on the taxpayer’s particular circumstances. Read More
Read More
Medicaid surrounded by a stethoscope

Trends in Medicaid Restrictions

Medicaid surrounded by a stethoscope Last year saw two huge trends in Medicaid restrictions: work requirements and a change in retroactive coverage. Several states have been approved for these Section 1115 Medicaid waivers and are already implementing these changes. Other states have applied for waivers that are pending. In this article, we will explain what a Section 1115 Medicaid waiver is, how work requirements and retroactive coverage are changing Medicaid benefits, why these changes are happening, what to watch for in 2019, and how these trends may impact other states. What is a Section 1115 Medicaid Waiver? Under Section 1115 of the Social Security Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) can waive specific provisions of major health and welfare programs, including certain requirements of Medicaid. This gives the Secretary authority to allow states to use federal Medicaid funds in ways that are not otherwise permitted under the federal rules, as long as the Secretary determines that the initiative is an “experimental, pilot or demonstration project” that “is likely to assist in promoting the objectives of the program.” These Section 1115 Medicaid demonstration waivers let states test new approaches in Medicaid that are different from federal program rules, giving them flexibility in how they operate their programs, as long as they promote the government’s objectives. States can obtain comprehensive Section 1115 waivers that make broad changes in Medicaid eligibility, benefits and cost-sharing, and provider payments across their programs. There are also narrower Section 1115 waivers that focus on specific services or populations. Waivers are typically approved for a five-year period and can be extended, typically for three years. Also, they must be budget neutral for the federal government. In other words, federal costs under a waiver must not exceed what those costs would have been for that state without the waiver. The federal government enforces this by placing a cap on federal funds under the waiver, putting the state at risk for any costs beyond the cap. Section 1115 waivers are also subject to new rules about transparency, public input, and evaluation. Public notice and comment periods at the state and federal levels are required before the Centers approve new Section 1115 waivers and extensions of existing waivers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). States must also have a publicly available, approved evaluation strategy and are required to submit reports at least annually that describe the changes occurring under the waiver and their impact on access, quality, and outcomes. Waiver Objectives Changed In 2017, CMS changed the criteria for evaluating whether Section 1115 waiver applications further Medicaid program objectives. Instead of including expanding coverage, the revised criteria now focus on “positive health outcomes, efficiencies to ensure program sustainability, coordinated strategies to promote upward mobility and independence, incentives that promote responsible beneficiary decision-making, and innovative payment and delivery system reforms.” Waivers Imposing Work Requirements On January 11, 2018, CMS posted new guidance for waiver proposals that impose work requirements as a condition of eligibility for Medicaid. CMS asserts that such provisions would promote program objectives by helping states in their efforts to improve Medicaid enrollee health and well-being through incentivizing work and community engagement. States are invited to submit proposals designed to promote better mental, physical, and emotional health, or help individuals and families rise out of poverty and attain independence. As of January 3, 2019, seven states (Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire, and Wisconsin) have received approval for waivers that impose work requirements. An additional nine states (Alabama, Arizona, Kansas, Mississippi, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Utah, and Virginia) have submitted waivers that are pending. Kentucky was the first state to receive the approval as part of a broader overhaul of the state’s Medicaid program. However, a federal judge blocked those work requirements just days before they were to take effect in July 2018. Kentucky modified their waiver and again received approval in November 2018. The work requirements are aimed at the newly eligible Medicaid enrollees who gained coverage through Medicaid expansion as part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Under the work requirement waivers for most states, able-bodied adults will be required to complete 80 hours a month of community engagement to qualify for coverage. This would include work, education, volunteering/community service or job training. Drug treatment is considered a work activity, not an exemption. Enrollees can seek “good cause” exemptions if they can verify one of the following in their month of noncompliance: disability, hospitalization or serious illness of the enrollee or immediate family member in the home; birth or death of family member living with the enrollee; severe inclement weather including natural disaster; family emergency or other life-changing event such as divorce or domestic violence. In addition, one primary caregiver of a dependent minor child or adult with disabilities per household is exempt, and caregiving for a non-dependent relative or another person with a disabling medical condition is considered a work activity. Arkansas was the first state to implement Medicaid work requirements. The most recent data shows around 18,000 recipients have lost coverage due to the new rules. While studies do expect some people to lose coverage, they predict that most would transition off Medicaid because they enter the workforce, get a better job and higher wages, and gain access to employer-sponsored insurance or other private insurance. One study has proposed that implementing a work requirement could increase lifetime earnings by nearly $1 million for non-disabled people who leave Medicaid. However, one major challenge is that low-income adults often have a hard time finding jobs with decent pay and health benefits, and may lack transportation to get to available jobs. Research also shows that all but a small percentage of non-disabled Medicaid enrollees are already employed, in school, or caring for children or disabled family members. What to Watch for in 2019 For states with approved work requirement waivers, CMS requires follow up evaluations and reporting to determine if the work requirements lead to improved health, well-being, and independence. Individuals who experience a lapse in eligibility or coverage because they failed to meet the program requirements or because they gained employer-sponsored insurance will also be surveyed. Watch for some pending states to become approved, which will lead to larger pools of data for CMS’ evaluations. Waivers Changing Retroactive Benefits On October 26, 2017, CMS approved an amendment to Iowa’s Section 1115 demonstration waiver eliminating three-month retroactive coverage for nearly all new Medicaid applicants as of November 1, 2017. Those affected include low-income parents, children over age one, ACA expansion adults, seniors, and people with disabilities. Retroactive coverage waivers have also been approved in a limited number of other states with certain conditions. Federal law directs state Medicaid programs to cover (and provides federal matching funds for) medical bills incurred up to three months prior to a beneficiary’s application date. To qualify for retroactive coverage, a Medicaid beneficiary must have been eligible for coverage during the three months prior to application when the bill was incurred, and the services must be those that Medicaid covers. Some people may not become eligible for Medicaid until after they experience a traumatic event, such as a fall or a stroke, that requires hospitalization and long-term care. Also, many people mistakenly think that Medicare covers long-term care and often do not learn about Medicaid until they need to seek a nursing home placement or other long-term care services. The initial focus is often on stabilizing the person’s medical condition, and it may take several days or weeks for the patient, their family, and providers to figure out complex medical issues before they turn to consider payment, including Medicaid eligibility. During this time, sizable medical bills can start adding up. Retroactive coverage protects patients and providers by ensuring that medical bills are paid even if a Medicaid application is not filed immediately following the need for care. Initially, Iowa’s Section 1115 demonstration waiver was limited to adults newly eligible under the ACA and did not apply to traditional Medicaid populations. However, on October 26, 2017, CMS approved an amendment to Iowa’s waiver, eliminating three-month retroactive coverage for nearly all new Medicaid applicants as of November 1, 2017. Coverage for people affected by Iowa’s waiver will now begin no earlier than the first day of the application month. In approving Iowa’s retroactive coverage waiver, CMS concluded that Medicaid program objectives are furthered “by encouraging beneficiaries to obtain and maintain health coverage, even when healthy.” For seniors and people with disabilities seeking long-term care coverage, CMS states that “this waiver will encourage beneficiaries to apply for Medicaid expeditiously when they believe they meet the criteria for eligibility to ensure primary or secondary coverage through Medicaid to receive these services if the need arises.” Iowa’s waiver amendment submission to CMS acknowledged that most of the public comments received were opposed to the elimination of three-month retroactive coverage. However, the state “assures CMS that it will provide outreach and education about how to apply for and receive Medicaid coverage to the public and to Medicaid providers, particularly those who serve vulnerable populations that may be impacted by this change.” Iowa admits the change is being made to reduce program costs and estimated that eliminating retroactive coverage would likely reduce monthly enrollment by about 3,400 enrollees and reduce federal and state Medicaid expenditures by $36.8 million annually ($9.7 million state share).” Other States with Waivers for Retroactive Eligibility Prior to Iowa’s waiver, CMS (under the Obama Administration) waived retroactive eligibility for certain populations as part of three other ACA expansion waivers (New Hampshire, Arkansas, and Indiana) provided that certain conditions to safeguard beneficiaries were met. Unlike Iowa, these waivers do not apply to seniors and people with disabilities. Delaware, Massachusetts, Maryland, Tennessee, and Utah have retroactive coverage waivers that pre-date the ACA. Some of these waivers apply to limited populations, and most have exceptions for seniors and people with disabilities. Florida was the latest state to obtain a waiver for retroactive eligibility, receiving approval in December 2018. What to Watch in 2019 Other states may seek similar waivers. For example, Kentucky’s pending retroactive coverage waiver application includes most populations (except pregnant women and children under age one). The new transparency rules, including public notice and comment periods at the state and federal levels, help stakeholders learn about state proposals and provide input. The steps that states take to encourage eligible people to enroll in Medicaid and prevent delays in coverage that can lead to unpaid medical bills will be an important area to watch. Navigating the Medicaid application process can be confusing, particularly for seniors and people with disabilities who are seeking long-term care coverage. Eliminating retroactive coverage means that the ability to recognize eligibility and apply as quickly as possible will become very important, to minimize unpaid bills. Evaluations can provide information about the impact of retroactive coverage waivers on beneficiaries and providers, and whether these waivers help promote or hinder access to coverage and care, specifically for seniors, people with disabilities, those with long-term care needs, children, and adults. It will also shed light on providers’ uncompensated care costs. Other Recently Approved Section 1115 Medicaid Waivers Include: Coverage lock-outs for failure to timely renew coverage or report changes affecting eligibility Approval to charge premiums up to 4% of family income Premium surcharge for tobacco users Fees for missed appointments Elimination of non-emergency medical transportation (NEMT) Healthy behavior incentives tied to premium or cost-sharing reductions Allowing states to use federal Medicaid funds to pay for mental health and substance use treatment services in institutions for mental disease (IMDs) with no limit on the number of days; expanding community-based behavioral health benefits; and expanding Medicaid eligibility to cover additional people with behavioral health needs Waiver Provisions Not Always Approved It is also important to note that CMS has not approved some state waiver proposals. For example, it did not approve requests in Arkansas or Massachusetts to limit ACA expansion eligibility to 100% of the federal poverty limit (FPL) with the enhanced match. CMS also rejected Kansas’ proposal to impose a lifetime limit on Medicaid benefits for eligible beneficiaries. Also, Massachusetts’ proposed waiver amendment requesting a closed prescription drug formulary was denied. Conclusion We care deeply about issues that affect the elderly, the disabled, and our Veterans and will continue to watch future developments, especially restrictions to Medicaid benefits and how they affect our most vulnerable, to keep you informed. Sources https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/medicaid-waiver-tracker-approved-and-pending-section-1115-waivers-by-state/ https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/maps-and-interactives/2018/dec/status-medicaid-expansion-and-work-requirement-waivers https://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20181203/NEWS/181209991 https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2018/dec/evaluations-medicaid-1115-restrict-eligibility https://www.miamiherald.com/news/health-care/article222558105.html https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/section-1115-medicaid-demonstration-waivers-the-current-landscape-of-approved-and-pending-waivers/ https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/medicaid-retroactive-coverage-waivers-implications-for-beneficiaries-providers-and-states/ To comply with the U.S. Treasury regulations, we must inform you that (i) any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this newsletter was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal tax penalties that may be imposed on such person and (ii) each taxpayer should seek advice from their tax advisor based on the taxpayer’s particular circumstances. Read More
Read More